Menstuff® has information on Gender Equality.
you've never heard of the gender pay gap, watch Corporate
America get schooled on it by 4 kids
Some basic concepts
While in the 1970s and 1980s women activists talked about "integrating women into development", in the 1990s the emphasis was on the integration of gender issues as part of development policy and planning.
"It ought to be a beautiful position in life: to be young and to have a life ahead for which you can plan and dream. It ought, furthermore, to be equally beautiful whether you are a young woman or a young man. In reality, however, many young people are deprived of their rights to make plans and have dreams, as well as of their rights to security and dignity in life. In reality, it also makes a substantial difference if you are born a girl or a boy. Young women run a much higher risk of having their fundamental rights as human beings violated."23
Today, both the terms "women's rights" and "gender equality" are used. What do the terms mean and what is the difference between them? The phrase "women's human rights" is used to emphasise the point that women's rights are human rights, rights to which women are entitled simply because they are human. This idea integrates the topic of women into the human rights movement, and integrates human rights principles into the women's movement at the same time.
Gender equality means an equal level of empowerment, participation and visibility of both sexes in all spheres of public and private life. Gender equality is not to be thought of as the opposite of gender difference but rather of gender inequality. It aims to promote the full participation of women and men in society. Gender equality, like human rights, must be constantly fought for, protected and encouraged.
The term `gender' refers to the socially-constructed roles of women and men which are attributed to them on the basis of their sex. Gender roles therefore depend on a particular socio-economic, political and cultural context and are affected by other factors including race, ethnicity, class, sexual orientation and age. Gender roles are learned and vary widely within and between cultures. Unlike a person's biological sex, gender roles can change.
"The discussion about socialisation and stereotypes revealed the `old' forms of socialisation created spaces for new forms of identity and individuality. `New' forms of socialisation are taking their place but they may be replicating similar stereotypical expectations and producing similar consequences as before. The influences of the family, school and the workplace may no longer be so powerful, but new information technologies and burgeoning cultural practices (in music, media and television) may be stepping into the breach, strengthening the social power of men and maintaining the subordination of women."24
How easy is it for men to adapt to the changes that have come about as a result of the recognition of women's rights?
Examples of violations of women's rights
The most common form of violence against women is domestic violence. Domestic violence has for many years been considered a private affair, in which the state and the judicial system has no business interfering. Yet domestic violence is not only a violation of the physical and psychological well-being of the women concerned, and therefore a direct attack on their human rights, it is also a criminal offence.
"Statistics are grim, no matter which part of the world one focuses on ... No country or region is exempt from domestic abuse". So says a UNICEF report on domestic violence against women and girls, published in 2000, in a first attempt to establish the global dimensions of this phenomenon.
Trafficking of women and girls
Every year, millions of men, women and children are the victims of trafficking worldwide in conditions amounting to slavery. Among these numbers, many thousands are young women and girls who have been lured, abducted or sold into forced prostitution and other forms of sexual servitude. The process is made even easier by globalisation and modern technologies. The underlying causes of trafficking include poverty, unemployment and a lack of education, all of which force people to take risks to improve their quality of life. One worrying trend in industrial countries is "the use of cheap and undeclared labour forces as well as the exploitation of women and children in prostitution and pornography."25
Trafficking in human beings is hardly a new phenomenon, but selling naïve and desperate young women into sexual bondage has become one of the fastest-growing criminal activities in the global economy. "The trafficking flow between certain developing countries (Northern and Central Africa, Latin America and Asia) and Western destination countries continues. However, the most striking factor ... is the increase in the number of women and children trafficked into the European Union from central and eastern European countries. Estimates of up to 120000 women and children being trafficked into western Europe each year are made."26 For several years now, the trafficking of women and children - and of people in general - has been a priority issue on the working agenda of the Council of Europe.
Female genital mutilation
Every year in the world, two million little girls are circumcised in this way, (Editor's note: Compared to that man boys in the U.S. alone.) and that is in addition to the 130 million circumcised women.27
The practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) affects an estimated 130 million girls and women and is most prevalent in Africa. FGM is a cultural practice harmful to women, which violates women's human rights to life, body integrity, health and sexuality. Because it is practised mostly on young girls, female genital mutilation also raises serious questions about children's rights.
In conflict areas...
In recent years, episodes of violence against women were reported in Bosnia, Cambodia, Chechnya, Haiti, Peru, Somalia, Sierra Leone, East and West Timor, and in other conflict zones of the world. At some point, the international community will have to find alternative responses to the small number of ad hoc international criminal tribunals - such as the ones for Yugoslavia and Rwanda. While these are useful and necessary, they are clearly inadequate and insufficient for protecting women's rights.
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
"regrets that despite the fact that rape has been recognised as a war crime, it continues to be systematically used - and has been so in recent conflicts (Kosovo and Chechnya) - as a war weapon inflicting not only psychological trauma but also forced pregnancy."28
What can be done to put an end to violence against women and girls?
Existing international human rights instruments
Since the United Nations held the first world conference on women (Mexico City, Mexico, 1975), important progress has been made towards achieving equality between women and men.
The United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM) was set up in 1976 to fund innovation and change in this area. Since then, it has supported numerous projects and initiatives throughout the developing world, promoting the political, economic and social empowerment of women.
The first legally binding international document prohibiting discrimination against women and forcing governments to take steps in favour of equality for women is the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women ("Women's Convention" or CEDAW). This was adopted in 1979 and came into force in 1981.
The convention aims to eliminate all forms of discrimination against women. This is defined in Article 1 as "any distinction, exclusion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the purpose or effect of impairing or nullifying the recognition of enjoyment or exercise by women, irrespective of their marital status, on a basis of equality of men and women, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, social, cultural, civil or any other field". States Parties are obliged to submit periodic reports on their compliance with the convention.
"Inequality and disparities between women and men in the field of human rights are inconsistent with the principles of genuine democracy."
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Resolution 1216 (2000).
Over the past decade, a global movement has emerged to challenge the limited notions of human rights that see the rights of women as secondary to other human rights questions.
In 1999, the General Assembly of the United Nations added an optional protocol to the CEDAW that had been elaborated by the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. The Optional Protocol entered into force in 2000. It marks an important step in the protection of women's rights, in so far as it allows individual women or groups of women to submit allegations of human rights violations directly to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. It also provides the Committee with the ability to initiate inquiries into cases of grave or systematic violations of women's rights around the world. However, the force of the protocol is limited, since ratifying states have the option of rejecting a request from the Committee to investigate violations of women's rights on their territory.
Within the Council of Europe, the issue of equality between women and men is seen as a fundamental human right and is the responsibility of the Steering Committee for Equality between Women and Men (CDEG). This is an intergovernmental body within the Council, which carries out analyses, studies and evaluations, defines strategies and political measures and, where necessary, decides on the appropriate legal instruments.
The main problem is that the definition of equality used is a very narrow one of de jure equality and this does not always provide protection against discrimination. A second problem lies in the fact that women have traditionally had to work on these questions outside the "mainstream" of society. A third problem is that women occupy a weak position in decision-making structures in most countries.29
The 1995 Fourth World Conference of Women, held in Beijing, China, drew together almost 47000 women and men, and to date it remains the largest gathering of government and NGOs representatives at any United Nations conference. At this historic event, 189 countries unanimously adopted the Beijing Declaration and the Platform for Action. National governments committed themselves to promoting gender equality in the formulation of all government policies and programmes. They identified the following twelve common critical areas of concern: poverty, education and training, health, violence against women, armed conflict, economy, power and decision-making, institutional mechanisms for gender equality, human rights, media, the environment and young girls.
Education ... the solution.
A very important step would be to move from rights recognition to rights empowerment. All human rights educators need to appreciate the sensitive nature of the human rights vision and to honour the differences among individual women's needs and responses. Without such sensitivity, human rights education could become just another form of manipulation or oppression of women. Education is a key target for gender equality, since it involves the ways in which societies transfer norms, knowledge and skills.
"Combating gender-based violence and promoting gender equality requires education and active involvement of all sectors of society, especially young women and men and members of minority groups, from the beginning"30
As an educator or youth leader, do you use a gender focus in your work with young people?
Connell, R. W., Gender and power, Stanford University Press.
Mertus, J., Flowers, N., Dutt, M., Local action, global change, UNIFEM and the Center for Women's Global Leadership, 1999.
Williams, S., and others, The Oxfam gender training manual, Oxfam Publication, 1994.
Ramberg, I. Violence against young women in Europe, seminar report, Council of Europe, 2001.
Some useful websites on women's issues
OECD-DAC Gender, www.oecd.org/dac/gender
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco), www.unesco.org/gender
United Nations Statistics Division Gender Statistics, www.un.org/depts/unsd/gender
United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), www.undp.org/unifem
Women Watch, www.un.org/womenwatch
European Women's Lobby (EWL), www.womenlobby.org v
Women Against Violence Europe (Wave Network): www.wave-network.org
Men Against Violence Against Women (MAVAW), menagainstviolence.tripod.com
Young Women from Minorities (WFM), www.wfmonline.org
23. Ingrid Ramberg, in "Violence against young women in Europe", Council of Europe, 2001.
24. Radicova I., "Human Rights of girls and young women in Europe: questions and challenges for the 21st Century", General Conclusions, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 1994.
25. Extract from "Trafficking in women, a comprehensive European strategy", information sheets, European Commission
27. Lori, H., German, A., Pitanguy, J., Violence against women: the hidden health burden, the World Bank, Washington, D.C, 1994.
28. Resolution 1212 (2000), Parliamentary Assembly, Council of Europe
29. Gender mainstreaming conceptual framework, methodology and presentation of good practices. Final report of activities of the group of specialists on mainstreaming (EG-S-MS), Strasbourg, May 1998.
30. Statement by the participants at the seminar "Violence against young women in Europe", European Youth Centre Budapest, 2001.
One study might have discovered the reason for the business gender gap -- morality.
Previous explanations for the underrepresentation of women in business include women being siphoned by other industries or failing to "lean in." The issue is certainly not one of capability: according to the New York Post, 2010 research from the University of Texas found that women are better at gauging risk, and are thus more successful Wall Street traders than men.
Recent years have seen more women showing interest in business school, but women remain underrepresented in MBA programs.
Could the gender gap in business be explained by differences in ethics?
That's the premise of a new paper forthcoming in Social Psychology and Personality Science, conducted by psychologists Jessica Kennedy and Laura Kray, the New York Post reported. The pair conducted three separate studies to see how women and men reacted when confronted with ethical dilemmas in a business context.
In the first study, 103 participants read 14 vignettes describing ethical compromises in the workplace, including, for example, the story of a manager taking credit for a project his subordinate stayed late at the office to finish. They then rated how objectionable these behaviors were, and how much business sense they made. Women were more likely than men to find the acts offensive, and to think that they made less business sense.
In the second study, 178 undergraduate students read three consulting and finance job descriptions. One third of the participants were given job descriptions that included a description of ethical issues he or she could expect to face, and were told that the company had a "whatever it takes" mentality. Another third of the participants read descriptions that included ethical dilemmas, but the description also explicitly stated that the company would expect employees to do the morally right thing. The final third of participants read job descriptions that made no mention of ethics at all. Results showed that male participants were equally interested in the jobs regardless of what the description said about ethics, and women were just as interested when ethics weren't mentioned or when they were told to "do the right thing." However, women exhibited less interest in jobs at the "whatever it takes" companies, suggesting that they were less comfortable with breaching ethics.
In the third study, Kennedy and Kray asked a group of 106 students to take an implicit association test (IAT). They found that female participants were much more likely to associate business with immorality than men.
So what's the solution? Since it seems unlikely that women will become more comfortable with the idea of unethical behavior in business, the challenge seems to be for businesses to stop requiring ethical compromise, if they do, and for them to show women that they don't.
According to Slate, Kray offered a solution: We
need to see more women at the top. I think that will change
the culture of corporate America.
Especially when it's because who they are inside doesn't seem to match who people assume they are on the outside.
P.S. This mom is understandably angry and upset, but I'm not a fan of the portrayal of her as aggressive and physically violent.
Gender norms are complex and antiquated things. We are starting more and more to understand that gender is a spectrum and that we can't assume we understand or know someone's gender identity based on the sex they appear to be.
People often argue that kids can't know what gender they are at ages as young as 3 or 5 ... but I would argue that kids know a heck of a lot more about themselves than we know about them. Who are we to judge each other based on what we assume we know? Nothing good can come of that.
In fact, the consequences of that judgment and rejection can be deadly. Teenager Leelah Alcorn was 17 when she apparently stepped in front of a truck and died. In her suicide note, she talked about her parents trying to "fix" her.
Here's one heartbreaking excerpt:
"The only way I will rest in peace is if one day transgender people aren't treated the way I was, they're treated like humans, with valid feelings and human rights. Gender needs to be taught about in schools, the earlier the better. My death needs to mean something. My death needs to be counted in the number of transgender people who commit suicide this year. I want someone to look at that number and say "that's fucked up" and fix it.
It's possible that if Leelah had lived, she would have transitioned to living as a woman, which for her may have meant her life would totally change. Some say it is a selfish decision; others say it simply is not a decision. It's who they are and always have been. Joy Ladin, who is the first openly transgender professor at an Orthodox Jewish school, speaks to this:
"It looks to people like a choice. And it's clearly a choice that was terrible for my family, it was terrible for my wife, it broke up my marriage, it broke up my children's home. ... It really wasn't good for anybody particularly, except for me. So, if I chose to do something that was bad for everybody but me, that's an act of radical even sociopathic selfishness ... but to me ... there was no one else I could be. It wasn't a selfish choice. It was a choice between living or dying."
She goes on to talk about how she seriously considered suicide for many years, but thought transitioning into living as a woman was a better option for her family. Joy was in her 40s when she transitioned.
The image of the father wearing a dress and accepting his child is so powerful, and the destructive nature of his rejection is also very real. I hope parents see this and realize that acceptance really can be a matter of life and death for their child.
Here are the lyrics to that beautiful song by HollySiz:
Let the light come through us
Let's believe in ourselves
Let the shout-outs locked up in our mouth
Let us go
Let us go
Let the shout-outs locked up in our mouth
Let's believe in our minds
Let's believe we will let the shout-outs locked up in our
Menstuff® is a registered trademark of Gordon Clay
©1996-2017, Gordon Clay